Right, in any police case the last known sighting of a victim plays an important part. Police try and find an independent sighting from a witness who is not the family or a friend of the family or by using CCTV.
In the case of Madeleine McCann, it was the creche workers who last saw Madeleine alive at 5.30pm on the 3rd May 2007, when she was last seen at the creche.
David Payne saw her alive after that but the last independent witness time was 5.30pm.
Goncalo Amaral has stated this on various documentaries, in his book and I really thought those that believe him would take his word.
But alas no.
I did, rather politely if I have to say so myself point this out to JillyCL in this tweet.
To which I received this:
I am really finding it hard to comprehend why they can’t see logic. If as they say Madeline is dead, which by the way I don’t believe for one minute, and she did die on the 1st May 2007, then Goncalo Amaral and his team are too incompetent to even get the last known sighting correct.
Logic tells me that if the Police can’t get a last known sighting and confirm beyond shadow of doubt that the last known sighting is correct, then surely a certain ex-coppers book is based on incorrect information which is libellous.
What don’t the anti-McCanns understand? Why don’t they understand the moment they deviate from the Goncalo Amaral thesis they are in fact proving that the entire investigation was bungled?
Because as sure as night follows day, they don’t do logic.