Lift off, here we go, Pat Brown has finally stopped doing photo-shoots with people who love to to appear in front of Judges and has finally set down to the task that she told the world she was going to do.
Investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and search for her.
Yes Pat Brown paraded around Windsor on Tuesday with Bennett, (who is awaiting trial in the High Court for Contempt of Court).
And then on Friday she posted a picture of her with Amaral (yes the one convicted of perjury and falsifying documents) .
Who looks to be wearing the same clothes as he did for his Algarve123 article back in December 2011
And yesterday she told the world she is going to post the results of her reconstruction.
- Has she managed to get all the holidaymakers back in PDL that were there on the night of the 3rd May 2007?
- Has she managed to turn what was the Tapas Bar back into a Tapas Bar after it became a Pizzeria?
- Has she managed to gain access to not just Apartment 5A but all the apartments that the McCann’s friends were staying at?
- Has she managed to get the waiters, Jez Wilkins, the McCanns and their friends to return to Portugal to help?
- Has she been able to get the Smith family back in PDL so that they can try to recall their movements on the night of the 3rd May 2007 and who they saw?
- Has she managed to speak to Mr George Burke/Brooks who saw a couple with a child in the early hours of the morning of the 4th May 2007 at Lagos Marina acting suspiciously?
- Has she managed to get the Police involved in doing this reconstruction? And I don’t mean that cop who was kicked off the case either.
Well you see until she manages to do those things listed above, her reconstruction is about as useful as a chocolate teapot. And her findings hold no credibility whatsoever.
And one of her previous tweets, the day before her photo-shoot with Amaral:
You mean learning the case from an anti-McCann perspective. Because it is evident that those people you are associating with and whose hospitality you are praising do NOT hold an unbiased opinion about this case. And if you are still learning, Pattie my dear, you were not qualified to write that pamphlet, sorry e-book, were you?
Just one more thing are you planning on searching in Huelva and Rothley like you originally stated?
Just asking Pat Brown and I await your reconstruction results. Reading the report of your reconstruction should keep me, and I suspect others, entertained on a damp, overcast Monday here in the UK.
More observations and valid points from people about this reconstruction:
- RingoStarfish: Why did Pat B not do her ‘reconstruction’ in PdL in early May when evening light levels would have been same as in 2007?
- Mobyra: Who has she cast as the main players and exactly WHERE is she’s doing this (cough) “re-construction”
So the long awaited blog post has finally arrived. On repeatedly being questioned about the man on the balcony having a fag, watching the window of apartment 5A,whilst Martha is in the apartment along with being asked for a link to the statement of this gentleman having this cigarette where he states that nobody broke into the window of the children’s bedroom, Pat Brown finally concedes that her first blog post is a FICTIONAL SCENARIO.
As I said, reconstruction my ass.
Oh Pat by the way you are providing an excellent scenario supporting the theory that someone could have been watching that apartment and was a look out for the person who was abducting Madeleine. And an excellent scenario that they used that apartment to keep Madeleine until the coast was clear to move her. Which would account for the time delay between Jane Tanner seeing the abductor and the Smiths seeing the abductor.