Well you can make of this what you want. Because I am at a loss here as to why a PJ Officer would even request to join Facebook groups, especially those that are anti-McCann. But by all accounts Ricardo Paiva has joined and posted on one (screenshots below) and posted on the other only to be deleted.
As this group is open on Facebook and any member of Facebook can view it, I have no problems highlighting what Ricardo Paiva posted on the Justice4Maddie Page.
And David Bret posts this on his Facebook page Maddie – In search of the truth.
Now why is a PJ Inspector, involved in this case, getting involved in disputes between people who support the McCann family and those who don’t.
Could it simply be, that the anti-McCanns and their actions are not boding favourably in Portugal?
Could it be that Goncalo Amaral has asked him to intervene, remember Goncalo Amaral is up against the PJ Disciplinary Board along with his friend Paulo Cristóvão, and the behaviour of his supporters is not doing him any favours now, is it?
One more thing I noticed even Paiva admits there is going to be a Court case on the 9th and 10th February, so why did Joana Morais tell people she can’t find it listed on the Court listings and it was McCann spin, when in it was originally reported on her own blog?
Or could this be damage limitation, the last thing that Goncalo Amaral needs is for the antics of his supporters being highlighted in a Court of Law and Isabel Duarte explaining to the Court this behaviour is all because of his flawed thesis and book?
Curiouser and curiouser.
The more I think about this the more concerned I am becoming. You see if that Facebook account is genuine and that is indeed Inspector Paiva of the PJ, why the hell is he posting on Facebook pages that are connected to a case that he is supposed to be involved in?
Irrespective of whether or not he agrees with the behaviour, then surely as a serving Police Officer if he thinks a crime has been committed, then he should do the right thing and report this to his superiors for them to investigate, am I correct or not?
I notice from his remarks, that he is a keen supporter of free speech on the internet, perhaps he will clarify whether he approves of the libellous and defamatory comments written about the parents, friends and family of a missing child?
Message for Kitti on Missing Madeleine Forum
As you have started your accusations (screenshot) that MuratFan has something to do with this blog, I will put you firmly in your place by proving your accusations are false . MuratFan doesn’t contribute to any blog posts and neither do they play any role other than possibly being a commentator under another alias which is unknown to myself.
This blog post was made at 17.07pm on January 10th 2012 (screenshot) by myself, after I found the comment on that Facebook page.
Richard Paiva posted on Justice4Maddie Facebook page at 14.47pm (screenshot), which is far earlier than it was posted on this blog. I will also provide you with a clear list of revisions, which prove (via wordpress) that this post was started well after Ricardo Paiva posted on Facebook (screenshot).
Now you know the facts, perhaps you will research more thoroughly in future, before you accuse people on forums of actions that are totally false. And you wonder why people change their minds about things and people.
You have failed miserably in trying to cause trouble for this blog and myself, because I have proven you to be nothing but a stirrer and liar.
Just one more thing, whatever is happening between Ricardo Paiva, Justine Spencer, David Bret and Thornton, is absolutely nothing to do with me, and I will NOT become involved in it, whatsoever, so you can all stop trying to drag me into it. I posted what Paiva said and remain by my firm opinion that if this was the real Ricardo Paiva it really does go to show what he thinks of the anti agenda when he refers to it as a witchhunt.